Working together to protect and restore the Harpeth River Watershed and provide expertise in statewide conservation policy

 
 

 

Franklin Drinking Water Plant -- Archives

.
Most documents need Adobe pdf reader. Download here for free

Official Comments to TDEC Requesting Denial of Franklin's Water Withdrawal Permit Application

Dr. Etnier (UTK) Comments

US Fish and Wildlife Service Comments

World Wildlife Fund Comments

Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility and TN Clean Water Network Comments

AquAeTer Comments

Franklin Citizen Comment

HRWA Comment Letter to TDEC

Supporting Documents Submitted to TDEC

HRWA Presentation at TDEC Hearing, March 8, 2007

HRWA Economic Expert Presentation to TDEC

HRWA Observations of City Water Withdrawal

USGS 15 Minute Flow Data

Harpeth River Flow Frequency Tables

CTE 10 cfs Financials

CTE 10/5 cfs Data

Franklin Drainage Area Map

Harpeth Headwaters Nutrient Study Report 2007

Sites of Dissolved Oxygen Violations in Harpeth River (poster)

Water Quality/Availability

Dissolved Oxygen in the Harpeth River, Summer 2007, Final Report

HRWA Summary/Comments to TDEC re: Summer 2007 DO Study

USGS Comments on HR Flows

USGS Map with Labels

Dissolved Oxygen in the Harpeth River, August - September 2006

Memo Attachment for DO Report 2006

HVUD Letter to TDEC

Dam and Water Withdrawal Stops Harpeth River Flows

HRWA-AquAeTer Presentation to City: Effects of Water Withdrawal on Low DO Level and River's Capacity to Handle Sewage Disharges

HRWA-AquAeTer River Flow Requirements to Handle Sewage Discharge Study

HRWA-AquAeTer Water Quality Analysis (WQA)

City Consultant Water Availability Study - Available in print from HRWA

City Consultant Comments on WQA

Rebuttal to Consultant Comments on WQA

Economic Issues

CTE's Economic Errors Mislead the Mayor and Do Not Preclude HVUD as a Practicable Alternative

HRWA Comments to Franklin and TDEC re: Canoe Trip, Summer 2007

HRWA-Wade Economic Analysis (EA)

City Consultant Water Plant Design Study - Available in print only. Contact HRWA for copy.

City Consultant Comments on EA

HRWA Cover Memo for Rebuttal of EA

Rebuttal to City Consultant Comments on EA

Fish and Wildlife

Harpeth River Fish Study 2006

View Current Information

Statement of HRWA Executive Director, Dorene Bolze to Franklin Board of Mayor and Aldermen, Sept. 11, 2007

Expansion Will Hurt Harpeth River
All From Cumberland is the Economical Choice

The state of TN held a public hearing in March at Franklin City Hall, to receive input into their decision regarding the City of Franklin's recent permit application to expand its old drinking water plant.

Currently, 66% to 75% of the city's water comes from the Cumberland River via purchases from the Harpeth Valley Utility District (HVUD) on an annual basis. Expanding the city's plant will not change this reliance on the Cumberland River. HRWA-funded studies demonstrate that the most economical option for the city tax payer is to close the city's drinking water plant and purchase all water from HVUD where the Cumberland has ample river flow for drinking water needs. Franklin's growth in the past decade has put greater reliance on the Harpeth River for handling treated sewage (effluent) from the city's newly expanded sewage treatment plant and from two small ones just downstream in the county. Thus, in the summer and fall, there is not enough water in the river any longer to also provide drinking water. Severe violations of state water quality standards are already occurring for dissolved oxygen levels.Maintaining river flow, removing the low head dam where the city currently withdraws water and modifying the summertime sewer effluent discharges are important factors involved in planning a long-term solution to enable the river to maintain healthy oxygen levels and continue to be an important recreational resource for the Greater Nashville region. .

Dam and Water Withdrawal Stops Harpeth River Flows

City of Franklin’s low head dam (photo below) on the Harpeth stops river flow for the city’s drinking water plant withdrawal. The dam stops all river flow periodically during the summer and fall causing water quality violations. The city has submitted a permit application to the state to increase the amount of water taken for a proposed plant expansion.

More pictures of stopped flow

Water Quality Issues Plague Harpeth River

Efforts to resolve the water quality issues that plague the Harpeth River during the low flow season (summer through fall) began in earnest in the fall of 2006. HRWA assembled expertise from various state and federal agencies, fish experts and private sector partners, such as The Nature Conservancy, to examine the expanding amount of data on the Harpeth in order to hone in on the causes and develop solutions to the river’s seasonal water quality problems.

Not Enough Water in Harpeth for Drinking

HRWA analyses have determined that the growing Franklin and Grassland communities currently depend on the Harpeth River to handle treated sewage (effluent). Due to this need, the river does not have enough water to continue providing drinking water. Franklin’s drinking water needs are already met more economically by utilizing the Cumberland River. Our analyses of data from EPA, the TN Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC), HRWA and others also show that levels of dissolved oxygen (D.O.), an important indicator of river health, are declining and are violating state standards along much of the river.

These violations will necessitate changes to the existing sewage treatment plant permits that are up for renewal in order to comply with the Clean Water Act. HRWA-AquAeTer Presentation to City: Effects of Water Withdrawal on Low DO Levels and River's Capacity to Handle Seweage DischargesPublic input is needed on March 8 regarding the decision to continue water withdrawals from the Harpeth in Franklin for the city’s antiquated drinking water plant. As far back as 2001, the city began evaluating the options for meeting new drinking water standards and growing demand. The first permit application to the state was deemed inadequate because there was no analysis of the withdrawal scenario that would maintain the river’s natural flows and water quality standards (See Fall 2005 HRWA newsletter article).

 

HRWA Comments on First Drinking Water Plant Application 2003

The new permit application proposes to expand Franklin’s drinking water plant from 2 to 4 million gallons per day and is based upon stopping water withdrawals when the river flow gets below a specific cutoff level. City Consultant Water Availability Study - Available in print form. Please contact HRWA for copy..
City Consultant Water Plant Design Study - Available in print form. Please contact HRWA for copy. Working with the city, HRWA funded analyses of what river flows are needed to ensure that water quality violations do not occur downstream from the withdrawal point and the sewage treatment plants.

Too Much Effluent Currently Permitted

HRWA’s contracted water quality analysis found that the river’s natural low flow conditions are not enough to handle all of the effluent currently permitted to be discharged. Franklin’s large, 12 million gallon a day (MGD) sewage treatment plant, which is currently only operating at half its full capacity (6 MGD), is just a few river miles downstream from where the water is withdrawn for the city’s drinking water plant. During the low flow season, removing any river flow reduces the ability of the river to handle effluent and still meet water quality standards. HRWA’s study found that the proposed withdrawal cutoff point for the drinking water plant is far too low. Violations of dissolved oxygen standards were recorded by TDEC when flows in the river were well above the proposed cutoff point. HRWA-AquAeTer River Flow Requirements to Handle Sewage Discharge Study
City Consultant Comments on WQA
Rebuttal to Consultant Comments on WQA

Plant Expansion Will Incur Losses

HRWA’s contracted economic analysis of the proposed drinking water plant expansion was done to fulfill state regulations requiring that alternatives be assessed in permit proposals. When the plant expansion was analyzed using standard accounting methods (present value analysis) including operating costs, capital expenditures, the variation in Harpeth River flows, and the existing city contract for water purchases, the analysis found that the plant expansion will incur financial losses both initially and in the long term. The analysis demonstrated that it would be more cost effective for Franklin to purchase all of its water from Harpeth Valley Utility District (HVUD) and shut down its existing drinking water plant. Currently, Franklin purchases 66% - 75% of its drinking water from HVUD which gets its water from the extremely large Cumberland River. The transition involved in purchasing all drinking water from HVUD would take about two years based on the city’s studies.

City Consultant Comments on EA
HRWA Cover Memo for Rebuttal of EA
Rebuttal to City Consultant Comments on EA

Dissolved Oxygen in Harpeth Extremely Low

Shutting down Franklin’s existing drinking water plant will also allow for the removal of the 50 year-old low head dam which, in addition to the withdrawals, exacerbates water quality problems by stopping the river’s flow entirely many times during the low flow season. Removing the dam is an important step toward addressing the dissolved oxygen problems in the river caused primarily by the downstream sewage treatment plants. Analysis of water quality conditions in the Harpeth by EPA combined with additional surveys of dissolved oxygen levels by TDEC and HRWA found that levels have been extremely low for days at a time at locations starting in Franklin below the dam, and below each of the sewage treatment plants and as far downstream as Bellevue (over 40 river miles away). See HRWA Water Quality Analysis Days of such low D.O. levels can lead to fish kills as well as pose threats to public health that would limit recreational use of the river at a time when Franklin is making major investments in parks, all connected by the Harpeth.

HRWA-TDEC Dissolved Oxygen Survey 2006 - Available in print form only. Please contact HRWA.

Effluent in River Leads to Low Dissolved Oxygen

Public input will also be needed regarding the three sewage treatment plants’ permits that are currently up for evaluation and renewal. HRWA’s analysis shows that the violations of the state dissolved oxygen standards during the low flow season is predominately caused by treated effluent. As a rule of thumb, rivers can maintain water quality standards if effluent discharge is about 10% or less of the flow. Analysis of the Harpeth flows that occurred when TDEC recorded consistent D.O. violations found that the AVERAGE percent of effluent in the river was already 29% (climbing as high as 73% at times). Had the city’s sewage treatment plant been processing at its full capacity, the AVERAGE percent would have been 70%. See HRWA Water Quality Analysis

Along with stopping the water withdrawals, another part of the solution to the low dissolved oxygen problem will be to reduce the amount effluent being introduced to the river during the low flow season. Since the City’s sewer plant is operating at half its capacity there is time to develop cost effective solutions. Franklin has already instituted an effluent reuse program that sends effluent to a nearby golf course and requires new development to use effluent to water landscaping. Since much summer water use is related to watering lawns, using effluent for irrigation helps reduce the demand for drinking water. Solutions will also involve treating the effluent that goes into the river during the low flow season to a higher standard. See HRWA-AquAeTer Presentation to City Low dissolved oxygen levels are also found in the river’s headwaters. HRWA has developed a community based headwaters restoration plan in Eagleville with state grant funds to improve water quality in the river before it reaches Franklin and the sewage treatment plants. (Details coming to web soon.)

Decisions Will Affect Finescale Darter

Instituting management decisions that will improve water quality is critical to maintaining the Harpeth’s fish populations that include species such as the fine scale darter, that still occur in downtown Franklin and are now only found in two rivers in the world—the Harpeth and the Red rivers. See Harpeth River Fish Study 2006 With funding from the World Wildlife Fund, Nissan, Patagonia and individuals, HRWA will be working with the EPA, TDEC, the sewer plant permitees, other state and federal agencies and outside experts to create a long term, cost effective plan that will improve water quality in the river for public health, fish and aquatic life and recreational enjoyment.

 

Harpeth River Watershed Association, P.O. Box 1127, Franklin, TN 37065,
615-790-9767, www.harpethriver.org, hrwa@harpethriver.org